
Is this the most active Feldman's work or is it just this Tzadik version?
it's true, picture discs are crap, why not just put out a flexi disc. i must however correct you guys, the lanthidine LPs aren't etched, but silkscreened. etching would be carved into the vinyl with no ink of a different color to come off on the plastic sleeve. great series though, i'm glad i bought all of them.grisha wrote:yeah i have that one. the etching got glued to the plastic envelope, and of course, like all picture LPs it has more surface noise than any normal LPs i have, at least new ones (and many older ones, too), because these lousy envelopes are obviously not enough to protect them. and then they don't look any better than normal cardpoard envelopes. i mean, what does is matter if the art is on LP itself or the package? i'll take jessica rylan's "new secret" as an exception, and even that i'd much prefer in regular packaging. in short, i hate picture LPs. people should stop putting them out.Salty Swift wrote:Yeah - I've got that one, along with another 5 or 6 of the Lathandies series, or whatever it was called.matinee wrote: i've torn the roof off with that before for sure.
Worth the money if only for the gorgeous etching on the second [non-playable] side.
My personal favourite from that series is Fahey and San Agustin.
sorry for the rant.
Yi wrote:
the guitar & sax duo, sounds pretty good.
who's company ufkc?
i've downloaded files from that guy.
Well, you didn't include the title so people could see what it was. I'm guessing it's Patterns in a Chromatic Field. It's not as sedate as most later Feldman.cleanzero wrote:
Is this the most active Feldman's work or is it just this Tzadik version?
Yes, it's "Patterns...", and I forgot to write the title. I wrote active just because it sounds very different from the other things I've heard. I think there are other releases of this work (like the one on HatHut) so I was wondering if they sound different from this one. However I like it a lot.fearandpanic wrote:Well, you didn't include the title so people could see what it was. I'm guessing it's Patterns in a Chromatic Field. It's not as sedate as most later Feldman.cleanzero wrote:
Is this the most active Feldman's work or is it just this Tzadik version?
And I don't know about "active," it's an unfortunate way of thinking about it. Try some of his music from the 50s and 60s.
Patterns... is great, and I know what you mean by "active", there is certainly more variation in that piece than much other Feldman.cleanzero wrote:Yes, it's "Patterns...", and I forgot to write the title. I wrote active just because it sounds very different from the other things I've heard. I think there are other releases of this work (like the one on HatHut) so I was wondering if they sound different from this one. However I like it a lot.
From what I recall the hathut version of Patterns is more like 50 minutes in length, broken up into two sections across two CDs.Richard Pinnell wrote:Patterns... is great, and I know what you mean by "active", there is certainly more variation in that piece than much other Feldman.cleanzero wrote:Yes, it's "Patterns...", and I forgot to write the title. I wrote active just because it sounds very different from the other things I've heard. I think there are other releases of this work (like the one on HatHut) so I was wondering if they sound different from this one. However I like it a lot.
The Hat version is my favourite, its slower, quite a lot slower, a good twenty minutes if I remember correctly, though the Tzadik is a nice recording too.
no, it's 105 minutes on the Hat Art version, 80 on the Tzadik. agreed that I prefer the Hat Art, and also that it's maybe my favorite non-Tilbury Feldman recording, and that the Tzadik version is also pretty good (I played the latter as intro music for Dion Workman's solo set at the first ErstQuake, he was pretty into it).Salty Swift wrote:From what I recall the hathut version of Patterns is more like 50 minutes in length, broken up into two sections across two CDs.
One of my favourite Feldman pieces by far.
jon abbey wrote:no, it's 105 minutes on the Hat Art version, 80 on the Tzadik. agreed that I prefer the Hat Art, and also that it's maybe my favorite non-Tilbury Feldman recording, and that the Tzadik version is also pretty good (I played the latter as intro music for Dion Workman's solo set at the first ErstQuake, he was pretty into it).Salty Swift wrote:From what I recall the hathut version of Patterns is more like 50 minutes in length, broken up into two sections across two CDs.
One of my favourite Feldman pieces by far.
comprehensive Feldman discography here:
http://www.cnvill.demon.co.uk/mfdiscog.htm" onclick= "window.open(this.href);return false;
I apologize for being vague on the details, but I read not too long ago that there is only one flexi disc pressing machine in North America, and that it is in need of repair. I guess Black Dice wanted to put their most recent single out on flexidisc to accompany the art book of the same name, but were unable to due to this situation.kristop wrote:[it's true, picture discs are crap, why not just put out a flexi disc. i must however correct you guys, the lanthidine LPs aren't etched, but silkscreened. etching would be carved into the vinyl with no ink of a different color to come off on the plastic sleeve. great series though, i'm glad i bought all of them.