well it's back but

carlos · Post by **carlos** » Mon May 19, 2008 6:10 pm

user_15 = me

tristan · Post by **tristan** » Mon May 19, 2008 6:29 pm

tristan <--> user_1808

Thanks all.

jon abbey · Post by **jon abbey** » Mon May 19, 2008 6:29 pm

user_1667 was Angelus Novus, now negative potential

faster · Post by **faster** » Mon May 19, 2008 6:49 pm

user_1689 is Gaendaal

sound plague · Post by **sound plague** » Mon May 19, 2008 7:52 pm

people know me! thanks for that.

visa tapani · Post by **visa tapani** » Tue May 20, 2008 3:19 am

Not that it matters so much with my post count, but I seem to be user_5111.

That new search functionality looks great btw. Especially happy to see "search topic titles only" now...

kangaroo? · Post by **kangaroo?** » Tue May 20, 2008 5:00 am

user_2217 = mic_kapa , i think he's reregistered

Post by **mudd** » Tue May 20, 2008 8:11 am

got those two, thanks

m

dolzenko · Post by **dolzenko** » Tue May 20, 2008 8:34 am

jon abbey wrote:the post count on the previous board wasn't accurate, as it included posts made that didn't make the transfer from the bagatellen domain to the noquam domain.

and with board totals (which were higher before loss) it was probably phpBB's (MySQL?) fault.
not even the fault but some fast but inaccurate algorithm to display them.
anyway, i think we've got all the stuff from the backup mark handed me (minus one broken post, and probably a few spam messages as well)

martin · Post by **martin** » Tue May 20, 2008 9:26 am

718 is me.

fearandpanic · Post by **fearandpanic** » Tue May 20, 2008 6:57 pm

user_5275 is clifford
user_4664 is walt
user_899 is fr333
user_5174 is bedouin
user_5314 is Dan G
user_113 is Smith6079

fearandpanic · Post by **fearandpanic** » Tue May 20, 2008 7:09 pm

user_5324 is diy double penetration
user_5154 is etbtc
user_5377 is trashthumb
user_5099 is walnutking
user_4920 is O'Grady
user_5095 is nash bridges
user_1026 is TWS
user_5094 is I Am King
user_3515 is meadowphantasm
user_5300 is raw.deal
user_2578 is efren_del_valle

Some of these people obviously haven't registered again (and some are multiple or obsolete accounts), but the names presumably still need to replace the numbers to make the threads in which they appear comprehensible.

Post by **mudd** » Tue May 20, 2008 7:52 pm

yes, i will definitely be going through and renaming as many numbers as i can for non-registering posters. though i'm going to let it sit for a bit, in case they do decide to register - i can't combine a renamed account with a new account with the current script, but there are other ways of making that work.

slightly more complicated.

anyone see any reason not to dump the archived IHM, IHF, and IHE into their respective homes now?

m

mitch · Post by **mitch** » Wed May 21, 2008 9:01 am

jon abbey wrote: user_4696 is mitch (Matt Mitchell, maybe mm on the new board?)

hi Jon/mudd, still mitch, though I often sign off as mm. Thanks!

-mm

Post by **mudd** » Wed May 21, 2008 10:43 am

two things:

we've had a lot of hotlinked images not showing up in threads lately. i realize sometimes it can be hard to tell, since the cached image might show up on your screen, but a lot of hosts don't allow it and it makes the threads difficult to read, especially when the images are not accompanied by text. this board has an attachment feature which should be active for everyone, please experiment with using that in situations where hotlinking may be blocked. problem sites include discogs, rateyourmusic, and blogspot.

i want to get old posts merged into remade threads effectively. hopefully by the end of today redundancies are cleared up and we can merge the fora. turns out it's really, really easy to do if you bump the new version of the thread with a link to the old (thanks f&p).

m

7/4 · Post by **7/4** » Wed May 21, 2008 11:15 am

Make a backup before you take the plunge.

.

snailed · Post by **snailed** » Wed May 21, 2008 11:19 am

sounds good on the merging stuff.

on the ihmm front, just letting everyone know that i am gonna merge the two threads that were stickied. it just seems to further deter people / complicate things, and the discussion for both can easily be contained in one thread. lemme know if anyone objects.

Chromosome · Post by **Chromosome** » Wed May 21, 2008 1:07 pm

mudd wrote:this board has an attachment feature which should be active for everyone, please experiment with using that in situations where hotlinking may be blocked. problem sites include discogs, rateyourmusic, and blogspot.

Image-hosting sites such as http://imageshack.us/ are also an option. I'm assuming there is a storage limit per user or maybe per post.

tadk · Post by **tadk** » Wed May 21, 2008 1:50 pm

user_841 = tadk

fearandpanic · Post by **fearandpanic** » Wed May 21, 2008 2:36 pm

user_5166 is insectfactory
user_2274 is latchstring
user_4543 is NdhW
user_4603 is vidjeraj
user_1226 is flies
user_5340 is practical listener
user_870 is ben drew
user_5114 is popluhv
user_776 is apophenia
user_2267 is Gerardo A.
user_112 is shiflet
user_3068 is Nipples

ihatemusic

well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but

Re: well it's back but