
Thank You Cecil
Re: Thank You Cecil
there is quite the lovefest going on on FB, nice to see.
- Steve Minkin
- Posts: 1677
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:11 pm
- Location: Healdsburg, California
- Contact:
Re: Thank You Cecil
Yes. So many tributes--and so much sadness.jon abbey wrote:there is quite the lovefest going on on FB, nice to see.
NP:

"Freedom of thought and speech without available means of gaining information and methods of sound analysis, are empty. Protection and security are meaningless until there is something positive worth protecting." E.W. Hall
-
Steve Reynolds
- Posts: 491
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:40 pm
Re: Thank You Cecil
Sometimes and most times when musicians who have had a profound effect on *my* life pass, I get a certain feeling kind of like the album that my friend Walter is listening to above (a record I was never able to deal with for whatever reason, fwiw) but reading that Cecil Taylor had passed is far different.
one of the few that was so so SO different and special in a hugely historical way.
Cecil was and is *always* hard to listen to even I was in a "space" back in the day when I had the endurance to listen to 5 or 10 or 15 hours of intense abstract free jazz at explosive volumes and massive variety, listening to Cecil's unrelenting intensity with his Units of the late 70's through the 80's (my most preferred Taylor by a fairly wide margin along with his late 80's and early 90's meetings with the European masters) was often a tough go but *sometimes* the payoff was of the highest order. A few of the times I listening to the full 50+ minute piece on Nailed with Evan on tenor or the 65+ minute disc 2 from Alms/Tiergarten with the large band, the results were beyond words. Of course one had to realize that Cecil took Coltrane one further as to my continued dismay, he *never* *ever* stopped playing. Too bad he has now stopped playing.
Plus what is most different is the effect that Cecil (of course he is one of the first name guys) had on music. To me he changed everything more than anyone else. Yes to me from my relatively small viewpoint as I'm limited compared to many here in my scope and vision of sound, he had more effect on the vast majority of the music that I love - more than anyone else.
Always a Pleasure
one of the few that was so so SO different and special in a hugely historical way.
Cecil was and is *always* hard to listen to even I was in a "space" back in the day when I had the endurance to listen to 5 or 10 or 15 hours of intense abstract free jazz at explosive volumes and massive variety, listening to Cecil's unrelenting intensity with his Units of the late 70's through the 80's (my most preferred Taylor by a fairly wide margin along with his late 80's and early 90's meetings with the European masters) was often a tough go but *sometimes* the payoff was of the highest order. A few of the times I listening to the full 50+ minute piece on Nailed with Evan on tenor or the 65+ minute disc 2 from Alms/Tiergarten with the large band, the results were beyond words. Of course one had to realize that Cecil took Coltrane one further as to my continued dismay, he *never* *ever* stopped playing. Too bad he has now stopped playing.
Plus what is most different is the effect that Cecil (of course he is one of the first name guys) had on music. To me he changed everything more than anyone else. Yes to me from my relatively small viewpoint as I'm limited compared to many here in my scope and vision of sound, he had more effect on the vast majority of the music that I love - more than anyone else.
Always a Pleasure
Re: Thank You Cecil
Thanks, Preach.
Cecil was one of those artists who was (I hate saying "was") always immediately recognizable--in spite of coming to have thousands of imitators over time. His style was both envelope-pushing and unique. But, of course, a lot of B-listers did
or do something original that can be quickly recognized. So exemplifying a recognizable newness isn't enough to guarantee greatness: there also has to be a kind of fecundity, a richness that allows for growth without boring repetition. That's a combination that most artists strive for, but few can achieve.
Cecil did.
Cecil was one of those artists who was (I hate saying "was") always immediately recognizable--in spite of coming to have thousands of imitators over time. His style was both envelope-pushing and unique. But, of course, a lot of B-listers did
or do something original that can be quickly recognized. So exemplifying a recognizable newness isn't enough to guarantee greatness: there also has to be a kind of fecundity, a richness that allows for growth without boring repetition. That's a combination that most artists strive for, but few can achieve.
Cecil did.
"Freedom of thought and speech without available means of gaining information and methods of sound analysis, are empty. Protection and security are meaningless until there is something positive worth protecting." E.W. Hall
-
Dan Warburton
- Posts: 7920
- Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 12:42 am
Re: Thank You Cecil

A giant. Always sad to see a musician of this stature go, but he left us with a body of work that will keep us busy for generations. It was a rare privilege to see him live - only twice, but both life-changing experiences. A drink will be raised.
http://www.paristransatlantic.com
REISSUED! Eric La Casa / Jean-Luc Guionnet / Dan Warburton METRO PRE SAINT GERVAIS
https://swarming.bandcamp.com/album/met ... nt-gervais
REISSUED! Eric La Casa / Jean-Luc Guionnet / Dan Warburton METRO PRE SAINT GERVAIS
https://swarming.bandcamp.com/album/met ... nt-gervais
-
Lao Tsu Ben
- Posts: 505
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 8:21 am
Re: Thank You Cecil
I've just discovered in disbelief that I learnt of his death nearly a month after it happened.
I consider myself lucky, too feeble a word, to have seen him at La Villette seven years ago with Amiri Baraka (who recited that poem about 9/11 which got him so much trouble, not unduly so, or so it seems).
I consider myself lucky, too feeble a word, to have seen him at La Villette seven years ago with Amiri Baraka (who recited that poem about 9/11 which got him so much trouble, not unduly so, or so it seems).
