It is currently Wed Oct 28, 2026 12:22 pm
Moderator: surfer
Rowdy Roddy had a far more stellar film career than Hulk Hogan.hatta wrote:Man Hell Comes to Frogtown is brilliant, I tells you brilliant! Rowdy, Roddy Piper at his "best".jpeatt wrote:
ive heard good things. i can't wait to see itscumtron wrote:
Probably the worst acting I've ever seen. A script written in broken English by an Italian, and then performed in broken English by American actors. Goblins living in Nilbog. Incredible.
I really, vehemently, disagree here. There is nothing 'bad' about John Waters' early films. They are cheap, to be sure. They are lurid, nasty and tacky. But considering the resources he had available, those early films, particularly Female Trouble and Pink Flamingos, are undeniably good, for me.Dan Warburton wrote:Yeah, well I've been confused about this thread all the way along.. We're talking so-bad-it's-good, right? Pink Flamingos is just plain bad most of the time. Female Trouble's more fun, but for me Waters hit his stride with Desperate Living and Polyester wins the Golden Dog Turd award.
Not enough to get hung up on them here. The 'lacking' quality of all those factors can be put down to lack of resources where Waters is concerned. 'So bad it's good' movies, for me, tend to have a certain 'cluelessness' about them, whereas Waters' films know exactly what they're about.Dan Warburton wrote:
As I said, he got better from Female Trouble onwards for me (and then start going downhill with Serial Mom). I haven't seen Eat Your Makeup or any of the other pre-Flamingos pics, but would like to. Anyway, depends what you mean by "bad", doesn't it? Does acting, image quality and editing matter to you?
Not that I'm an expert on John Waters, but I doubt he'd object to having his films in the same "camp" as Andy Warhol's Frankenstein. "Bad," another one with Warhol's name attached to it, has an incredible amount of parallels to Waters' movies. He wanted to make trashy movies!jpeatt wrote:
So while the thread is, as far as I'm concerned, about so bad it's good, I really don't think these films belong here, and it's a bit of a pet peeve of mine when they get clusteredd in among either that camp (no pun intended - oh, who am I kidding) or the grossout comedy world -
jpeatt wrote:I really, really love Commando.
There's an interesting little making of on the extras for the dvd I just watched of this a few weeks back. The original script was written about an ex-Israeli special services guy who gets forced back into action, and was intended to be a more Deerhunter/ First Blood type affair. The studio who had the rights to it at the time were looking for an Arnie vehicle, and there you have it.
gerf wachoob wrote:this isn't really a movie but its movie related. The star wars holiday special is classic. just got it from the pirate bay and i cant believe i hadn't heard of this before. I can see why the star wars people tried to forget it. if you haven't seen this, go get it. amazing.
seconded. ive seen bert i. gordon movies that were better than this. they didnt look better, but they were better.ghostargot wrote:The Room (dir. Tommy Wiseau)
This film exists in a class of its own... seriously.
1337ninjer wrote:I would also like to take a moment to address some comments I have heard about Tommy Wiseau himself....I would like to note that all of these attacks (he is pompous, arrogant, etc.) are patently false.
I think many people see Tommy during his interaction with the audience and can not understand the feelings they have. Rather than examine these feelings they simply decide that he is "pompous" or "arrogant" because they feel he is unapproachable. It makes sense. Here is a man who has everything many would dream of in Hollywood....
In light of all this I think people feel inferior to Tommy. He has everything they cannot...He is actually very approachable and a wonderful guy.
