Page 1 of 28
NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:38 pm
by jon abbey
someone beat New England, please.
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 10:37 pm
by jon abbey
I just heard on the radio that the Cowboys have won a total of one playoff game since 1996. good job, GM Jerry!
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:23 pm
by The G Man
Ravens have made the playoffs four years in a row, eight of the last 12. Not once in those 12 years did they have a premier QB. Flacco actually regressed this season. Fans here are unhappy with OC Cam Cameron.
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:59 pm
by Captain Hate
The G Man wrote:Ravens have made the playoffs four years in a row, eight of the last 12. Not once in those 12 years did they have a premier QB. Flacco actually regressed this season. Fans here are unhappy with OC Cam Cameron.
Unhappy is pretty mild compared to what I've seen on some of their game threads. Flacco is woefully inconsistent and far below what I thought he'd deliver after last season. The inability to get a consistently good QB through Billick and Harbaugh is one of the strangest anomalies I can think of. Maybe a new OC can resolve that.
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:04 pm
by The G Man
Captain Hate wrote:The G Man wrote:Ravens have made the playoffs four years in a row, eight of the last 12. Not once in those 12 years did they have a premier QB. Flacco actually regressed this season. Fans here are unhappy with OC Cam Cameron.
Unhappy is pretty mild compared to what I've seen on some of their game threads. Flacco is woefully inconsistent and far below what I thought he'd deliver after last season. The inability to get a consistently good QB through Billick and Harbaugh is one of the strangest anomalies I can think of. Maybe a new OC can resolve that.
Yeah, Flacco's crappy year was a big surprise to me but he did play decently over the last six games after a horrid start.
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 4:06 pm
by Enforcer
jon abbey wrote:I just heard on the radio that the Cowboys have won a total of one playoff game since 1996. good job, GM Jerry!
Only 40 more years without another and they'll have matched the Lions.
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 4:22 pm
by Harold Baines
Enforcer wrote:jon abbey wrote:I just heard on the radio that the Cowboys have won a total of one playoff game since 1996. good job, GM Jerry!
Only 40 more years without another and they'll have matched the Lions.
Maybe your boys can shock the world!
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 6:22 pm
by Captain Hate
Marvin might be worse with challenges than Tater-East. Btw is this the most boring playoff game any of you have seen? It seems like a late season match-up between 2 teams that won't be in the playoffs. That I'm watching it must be some sort of accomplishment for Goodell.

Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 6:58 pm
by jon abbey
yeah, like I said a few weeks ago, there are only 6-7 deserving playoff teams this year, and these two (Houston w/out Schaub/Leinart/Williams) aren't among them.
that being said, that pick by the DE for a TD was awesome. I love when you see a play in the first half and while you're watching it, you know it will almost certainly end up deciding the game.
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 7:48 pm
by Captain Hate
I like Tom Hammonds' announcing voice but God he says some dumbfuck things that normal prep should eliminate: Matt Schoob?? I think it's time for young Borat to get some national exposure.

Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 9:02 pm
by Captain Hate
Megatron beast mode engaged.
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:20 pm
by jon abbey
is he the best receiver in the league or Fitzgerald? Johnson had close to 500 yards in his last two games, right? that's just mindboggling.
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:23 pm
by Steve Reynolds
If the Pats and Saints play in the Super Bowl does either team punt?
but Detroit dropped 2 easy interceptions and had another one that could have been made.
Calvin Johnson is the best receiver I have seen since Jerry Rice, I think
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Sat Jan 07, 2012 11:34 pm
by Captain Hate
jon abbey wrote:is he the best receiver in the league or Fitzgerald?
I'd hate to have to choose other than there's no wrong answer. Megatron might have slightly more size; other than that it's Beast A versus Beast B.
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 7:37 am
by Mo Noyz
jon abbey wrote:is he the best receiver in the league or Fitzgerald?
I don't even consider it close. Megatron is on a whole other level right now. Andre Johnson, when fully healthy, is closer to him than Fitz, IMO.
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:28 am
by The G Man
Captain Hate wrote:Marvin might be worse with challenges than Tater-East. Btw is this the most boring playoff game any of you have seen? It seems like a late season match-up between 2 teams that won't be in the playoffs. That I'm watching it must be some sort of accomplishment for Goodell.

His first challenge was plain stupid. It's early in the game and the difference between third and tiny and 1st and 10 is small compared to the difference between results in typical challenges. Mayock pointed out that ball position challenges are seldom successful. I can't seeing ever making a ball position challenge on second down and 1 in the second quarter. Even if he wins it, the Bengals were over 50% to have made the 1st down anyway and Lewis will be out of challenges if his next one is a loser.
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:32 am
by The G Man
jon abbey wrote:is he the best receiver in the league or Fitzgerald? Johnson had close to 500 yards in his last two games, right? that's just mindboggling.
The two Johnsons and Fitz are all phenomenal receivers. Calvin certainly had the best QB of the three to hook up with this year. I'm not sure how one chooses among them. If anybody wants to describe their pluses and minuses relative to each other, rather than just assert "{} is the best!", the rest of us would probably find it interesting.
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:05 am
by walto
Watched both games yesterday, and as a fair weather, playoff watching fan, knowing basically nothing about the league for at least 20 years, I have to say that Houston seemed like the only one of the four teams that was even engaged on the defensive side of the ball. Jesus, games are boring when teams just march up and down the field as if there were nobody else around. So let me ask you mavens: can you now be a winning team in the NFL with no defense at all? What the fuck? Is it rules changes or something?
BTW, in the course of long years, I'd forgotten what a funny word "scrimmage" is. I think it was originally a misuse or mispronunciation of "skirmish" (which is itself kind of funny):
Skirmish - c.1300, from O.Fr. escarmouche "skirmish," from It. scaramuccia, probably from a Gmc. source (cf. O.H.G. skirmen "to protect, defend"), influenced in M.E. by a separate verb skirmysshen "to brandish a weapon," from O.Fr. eskirmiss-, stem of eskirmir "to fence," from Frankish *skirmjan, from the same Gmc. source. The verb is attested from c.1470.
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:42 am
by Mo Noyz
Rule changes, the lack of enforcement of the holding rule on offensive linemen, the advent of the ridiculous "hitting a defenseless receiver" penalty, and completely arbitrary suspensions and fines levied for a variety of subjective calls have all conspired to turn this game into a version of basketball with helmets and pads.
Re: NFL Playoffs 2011-2012
Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:46 am
by Mo Noyz
Mo Noyz wrote:jon abbey wrote:is he the best receiver in the league or Fitzgerald?
I don't even consider it close. Megatron is on a whole other level right now. Andre Johnson, when fully healthy, is closer to him than Fitz, IMO.
You know? I think you've got to put Welker in that discussion as well.
He's a little gnat compared to the other three, but no less dangerous.