Have we (you)? Where? In the meantime, have a new thread.jon abbey wrote:Haneke is a pretty problematic film maker in general, as I think we've discussed before.
jon abbey wrote: I have more respect for him than almost any other contemporary director, yet I have little to no interest in seeing any of his films more than once.
I'm just coming to him for the first time, would you believe. This is the first thing of his I've seen. But that "pretty bad" needs some explanation - I can see why you wouldn't like it, but why do you call it bad? I thought it was beautifully shot, edited with flair and rhythm - there's a real musicality to the scene where they're trashing the house, which builds impressively to the climactic axe blow to the aquarium (oops sorry spoilers oh dear haha never mind) - his eye for colour and detail is impressive. So the acting is rather flat.. but isn't that the point? Existence was rather flat for these people.surfer wrote:With the exception of Cache, I agree with that completely. I've really been disappointed by the other Haneke's I've seen, including Seventh Continent, which I thought was pretty bad.
Anyway, Benny's Video and 71 Fragments await. Will report back in due course.

