
Martyrs -- Pascal Laugier, 2008
jesus
Moderator: surfer

yawnMRS wrote: Martyrs -- Pascal Laugier, 2008
jesus
Thanks for the kind feedback. Actually, the Japanese postwar period is not so much a mystery since John Dower's monumental work Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II - not to mention others. In regards to films however, and specifically the Japanese New Wave movement, David Desser's Eros Plus Massacre: An Introduction to the Japanese New Wave Cinema is unequaled in scope and analysis. I think I read it at least 10 times while watching Imamura's films.leroysghost wrote: good to have you! any discussion of Imamura here would be most welcome, particularly the mysterious (in america anyway) '67-'75 period.
please feel free to start a thread.

funny, i totally prefer Plein Soleil. the Minghella version (1999 if you want to be a stickler) wreaks the whole psychology of the thing by adding the homosexuality (like any true sociopath, Ripley doesn't want to fuck Greenleaf--he wants to be him). Delon is the perfect actor for this part, and while i was a little disappointed to see that Ripley gets caught, i thought the ending itself was really well staged. overall i think it's a successful thriller in it's own right.Dan Warburton wrote: René Clément, Plein Soleil, 1960
I prefer Anthony Minghella's 2000 adaptation
thanks so much for this. i'll be sure to get around to reading it in the near future.Enoah_Ballard wrote: And speaking of Imamura, I uploaded a collection of essays edited by James Quandt for everybody's enjoyment. Link here.

You win the white carnation!leroysghost wrote:funny, i totally prefer Plein Soleil. the Minghella version (1999 if you want to be a stickler)Dan Warburton wrote: René Clément, Plein Soleil, 1960
I prefer Anthony Minghella's 2000 adaptation
He overdoes that in the film, for sure (the other musician character on the boat at the end is too much), but it's a sinister undercurrent in the Highsmith original (as it was in Strangers On A Train - and Hitchcock spotted it and dealt with it with great subtlety)leroysghost wrote:the homosexuality (like any true sociopath, Ripley doesn't want to fuck Greenleaf--he wants to be him).
No apostrophe in "its", if you want to be a sticklerleroysghost wrote:i think it's a successful thriller in it's own right.

i haven't read the books unfortunately, but as far as these films are concerned i'm not so sure. there certainly is some homoeroticism, but it's the homoeroticism of competition. plus, in Strangers you have the whole doppelgänger business to complicate things even further (and IMO Bruno clearly has a thing for girls in glasses).Dan Warburton wrote:but [homosexuality is] a sinister undercurrent in the Highsmith original (as it was in Strangers On A Train - and Hitchcock spotted it and dealt with it with great subtlety)
yes, it is almost annoyingly flawless. something of an underrated Hitchcock i think (if such a thing a possible).Dan Warburton wrote: Alfred Hitchcock, Dial M for Murder, 1954
every shot, every word just where it should be.
LG isn't commenting on the book, I am. He's commenting on a film which you don't mention, and I'm commenting on a film you haven't seen.anastasia vronski wrote:Thanks for link to booklet.
I've read Partricia Highsmith 's Ripleys and I agree with Leroysghost
Dan Warburton wrote: hey, I'm just a cynical old thug
It's true, I didn't join here for the film board.leroysghost wrote: thanks so much for this. i'll be sure to get around to reading it in the near future.
what's your taste in music by the way? i'm curious if anyone has ever joined this forum solely for the film board.

