Twentieth-century American poetry

Poetry, fiction, truth, and words on a page.

Moderator: michael

Post Reply
User avatar
fearandpanic
Posts: 2363
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 12:41 pm

Twentieth-century American poetry

Post by fearandpanic »

A place to discuss or post bits by (or about) your favourites, least favourites, the most overvalued, most undervalued, or the not valued at all.

(I know there's a poetry thread in the depths of "the hated world" somewhere, but it's a little too broad a topic.)

user_548

Post by user_548 »

Wallace Muthafuckin' Stevens.

I walked into the Supermarket today and heard 'Having a bad day? Roundy's Ice Cream makes it better. Having a good day? Roundy's Ice Cream makes it better!' I immediately thought of The Emperor of Ice Cream.

User avatar
faster
rasbliutto
Posts: 3278
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 6:54 pm
Location: The Internet
Contact:

Post by faster »

Oppen, man.

John Berryman doesn't seem to get much love these days.

But my favorite underrecognized poet is Robinson Jeffers. Really a titan.
You, of all people, should understand

User avatar
AlbionMoonlight
Posts: 525
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 12:14 am

Post by AlbionMoonlight »

Kenneth Patchen

user_710

Post by user_710 »

Oppen is my favorite.
Also love William Bronk.

Bill Williams, of course.



Favorite American poets presently writing: Michael Palmer and Peter Gizzi.

user_1950

Post by user_1950 »

Frank Bidart, particularly his longer poems like "Ellen West" and "The War of Vaslav Nijinsky."

Elizabeth Bishop. Robert Lowell. Lorine Niedecker. C.K. Williams.

user_4541

Post by user_4541 »

woah, weird. Peter Gizzi is teaching at my school's graduate program. I applied but didn't get in. argh. So is James Tate who is pretty good.

User avatar
faster
rasbliutto
Posts: 3278
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 6:54 pm
Location: The Internet
Contact:

Post by faster »

I really can't read James Tate.
You, of all people, should understand

User avatar
maRi
Posts: 911
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 7:52 am

Post by maRi »

why i am not a painter by frank o'hara is lovely.

i really appreciate his drawing attention to an important distinction, often overlooked. between 'the nostalgia of the infinite' and 'the nostalgia for the infinite' in personism: a manifesto, which is quite charming.
Frank O?Hara wrote:Personism has nothing to do with philosophy, it?s all art. It does not have to do with personality or intimacy, far from it! But to give you a vague idea, one of its minimal aspects is to address itself to one person (other than the poet himself), thus evoking overtones of love without destroying love?s life-giving vulgarity, and sustaining the poet?s feelings towards the poem while preventing love from distracting him into feeling about the person. That?s part of personism. It was founded by me after lunch with LeRoi Jones on August 27, 1959, a day in which I was in love with someone (not Roi, by the way, a blond). I went back to work and wrote a poem for this person. While I was writing it I was realizing that if I wanted to I could use the telephone instead of writing the poem, and so Personism was born. It?s a very exciting movement which will undoubtedly have lots of adherents. It puts the poem squarely between the poet and the person, Lucky Pierre style, and the poem is correspondingly gratified. The poem is at last between two persons instead of two pages.
also
Image
and stones
'...it was raining bourbon and (hic) champagne and bop (sic)...'


curious if you agree with the following and if they are related thoughts to you:
Edward Dorn wrote: A poet's occupation is to compose poetry. The writing of it is everywhere.
Frank O'Hara wrote:It is easy to be beautiful; it is difficult to appear so.

User avatar
Dohol
Posts: 2885
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 3:47 pm
Location: In the heart of the evil empire..
Contact:

Post by Dohol »

Faster wrote: But my favorite underrecognized poet is Robinson Jeffers. Really a titan.
Truth.
“In a kind of middle-aged crisis, it dawned upon me that there was a possibility that music might not even be an art form.”

Morton Feldman


http://soundcloud.com/doug-holbrook

nirav
Posts: 466
Joined: Wed May 21, 2008 8:45 am

Post by nirav »

http://www.writing.upenn.edu/pennsound/" onclick= "window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
fearandpanic
Posts: 2363
Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 12:41 pm

Post by fearandpanic »

"George Oppen's standard, his obsession, was "honesty" in the poem. Ezra Pound's ideogram of a man standing by his word. He insisted on writing only about what he himself had seen, and the act of seeing. The angels he had mentioned in a poem were the ones in the windows of Chartres. Uniquely among American poets, there are almost no mythological references and no myth-making, no exotica, no personae, only one or two passing historical references, and almost no similes in his work: in Oppen's world, things are not "like," they are there, right in front of you, and there with an exclamation mark.

Curiously, Oppen's struggle for "clarity"--another favorite word--did not result in the kind of small perfection of unadorned speech achieved by Reznikoff and Niedecker, poems that reached what Zukofsky called "total rest." Oppen's poems represent the struggle itself, and he continually rewrote them, cutting out and pasting words on top of other words, as though he were a mason building a brick wall. They are often abstract, as mystical as koans, a sea-surge of contradictory forces: assertions and their negations, declarations couched in double negatives, questions without answers, straightforward observations placed next to gnomic utterances..." -- Eliot Weinberger, from "Oppen Then" (preface to the New Collected Poems.)

User avatar
bryan
Posts: 1734
Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 12:34 am

Post by bryan »

fearandpanic wrote:"George Oppen's standard, his obsession, was "honesty" in the poem. Ezra Pound's ideogram of a man standing by his word. He insisted on writing only about what he himself had seen, and the act of seeing. The angels he had mentioned in a poem were the ones in the windows of Chartres. Uniquely among American poets, there are almost no mythological references and no myth-making, no exotica, no personae, only one or two passing historical references, and almost no similes in his work: in Oppen's world, things are not "like," they are there, right in front of you, and there with an exclamation mark.

Curiously, Oppen's struggle for "clarity"--another favorite word--did not result in the kind of small perfection of unadorned speech achieved by Reznikoff and Niedecker, poems that reached what Zukofsky called "total rest." Oppen's poems represent the struggle itself, and he continually rewrote them, cutting out and pasting words on top of other words, as though he were a mason building a brick wall. They are often abstract, as mystical as koans, a sea-surge of contradictory forces: assertions and their negations, declarations couched in double negatives, questions without answers, straightforward observations placed next to gnomic utterances..." -- Eliot Weinberger, from "Oppen Then" (preface to the New Collected Poems.)
I really like that description. Any Oppen online?

User avatar
faster
rasbliutto
Posts: 3278
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 6:54 pm
Location: The Internet
Contact:

Post by faster »

Not much, google tells me, but here's one:


Psalm

In the small beauty of the forest
The wild deer bedding down --
That they are there!

Their eyes
Effortless, the soft lips
Nuzzle and the alien small teeth
Tear at the grass

The roots of it
Dangle from their mouths
Scattering earth in the strange woods.
They who are there.

Their paths
Nibbled thru the fields, the leaves that shade them
Hang in the distances
Of sun

The small nouns
Crying faith
In this in which the wild deer
Startle, and stare out.

EDIT: this has pretty elaborate spacing. It was visible in the post window, but was reformated when posted. Oh well.
You, of all people, should understand

User avatar
faster
rasbliutto
Posts: 3278
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 6:54 pm
Location: The Internet
Contact:

Post by faster »

And a better one:

Who Shall Doubt


consciousness



in itself



of itself carrying



'the principle

of the actual' being



actual



itself ((but maybe this is a love

poem



Mary) ) nevertheless



neither



the power

of the self nor the racing

car nor the lilly



is sweet but this

again, imagine interesting spacing, sparse.
You, of all people, should understand


User avatar
Gaendaal
Posts: 985
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 6:17 am

Post by Gaendaal »

Why just American?

User avatar
Dohol
Posts: 2885
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 3:47 pm
Location: In the heart of the evil empire..
Contact:

Post by Dohol »

Good point.
“In a kind of middle-aged crisis, it dawned upon me that there was a possibility that music might not even be an art form.”

Morton Feldman


http://soundcloud.com/doug-holbrook

User avatar
P. Wretch
Posts: 319
Joined: Sat May 10, 2008 5:32 pm

Post by P. Wretch »

Some of the recorded utterances of Donald Rumsfeld (not just the famous 'unknown knowns' one) are uncannily close to Oppen:

Glass Box
You know, it's the old glass box at the?
At the gas station,
Where you're using those little things
Trying to pick up the prize,
And you can't find it.
It's?

And it's all these arms are going down in there,
And so you keep dropping it
And picking it up again and moving it,
But?

Some of you are probably too young to remember those?
Those glass boxes,
But?

But they used to have them
At all the gas stations
When I was a kid.

?Dec. 6, 2001, Department of Defense news briefing


The Situation
Things will not be necessarily continuous.
The fact that they are something other than perfectly continuous
Ought not to be characterized as a pause.
There will be some things that people will see.
There will be some things that people won't see.
And life goes on.

?Oct. 12, 2001, Department of Defense news briefing


Much as I despise the man, there is something inadvertently brilliant about that 'Glass Box' one, although it may have something to do with the Slate journalist's introduction of cunning line-breaks.

potatocircle
Posts: 269
Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 1:21 pm

Post by potatocircle »

I'm american but i'm not too fond of americans' poetry.

i'm a big fan of kurt schwitters, ernst jandl, paul celan, charles olson, j.h. prynne, ishmael reed (as poet, not fiction writer).

not 20th C., but been really enjoying refreshing the mallarme inside as i've been rereading the c.f.mcintyre translations closely with the french - and both are hilarious/ dismal.

hans magnus enzenberger's got some stuff i like too.

recently, the translation of Laura Sol?rzano's lobo de labio (LIP WOLF) has been providing much flagrance around the abode

Return to “I Hate Books”